Why The Queen Elizabeth Class Carrier Is So Powerful

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о Why The Queen Elizabeth Class Carrier Is So Powerful

Название	:	Why The Queen Elizabeth Class Carrier Is So Powerful
Продолжительность	:	4.59
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	57 rb

I wouldn't say thatI would rather say that the Americans are smoking the British by selling them F35s, which forces the British to build aircraft carriers without catapults and therefore not interoperable with other armies Moreover, they are dependent on the Americans who do what they want with them Furthermore, one of the aircraft carriers has already been removed, which is a failure
Comment from : gandigoogle gandigoogle

I miss the INVISIBLE CLASS , it was so stealthy!!
Comment from : Glastonbury

They still have that ridiculous ramp on the deck Get rid of that and put in the catapults
Comment from : CrustyCriter

THE " QE - I I , " " HER MAJESTY'S , " STRATEGIC EMERGENCY RESPONSE FLEET , AND EXTENSION AND AN EXPANSION OF , " HER brMAJESTY , " " QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND , " " BRITISH ROYAL NAVY " TO BE REMEMBERED ALWAYS AND IN MEMORY OF ,br" HER MAJESTY , " " QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND "br" APRIL 21 , 1926 " - " SEPTEMBER 08 , 2022 " " 2023 "br-- THANK YOU --
Comment from : Carlos Reyes

good luck
Comment from : tony griffiths

yes, the world wonders why (:-)
Comment from : Michael Pielorz

Excellent carriers but would be better with missile defense like the American French & Italian carriers
Comment from : Bob T

Close in weapon system CIWS (See-whiz) is the pronunciation not C1WS
Comment from : GDAGOD 88

Advanced radar, it can't detect the stealth rubber boats departing from France though
Comment from : Chris

Every F35 made is 15 to 20 British Engineered
Comment from : Brian Bloomfoeld

I dont know why people say the UK navy is in decline It has all the latest warships and technology and it's sailors are well trained and led
Comment from : Matthew Kent

Should have been 3 and should have been nuclear powered
Comment from : Jason

"Thales" is pronounced as "Talis"
Comment from : Panc8ke

Suggestion to the Royal navy: Scrap these two huge metal floating pieces of junk and buy the retiring USS Nimitz
Comment from : Xiang Yu

Oh god that intro such a seppo take
Comment from : Nickolai

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Comment from : Mario Cavuoto

The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers were built for the F35 , they were originally built to have Catobar and apparently that maybe done on it's first refurbishment, the carriers can take fully loaded 45 F35b , and up to 12 Apache, 12 chinooks, not to mention its complement of Merlin helicopters I expect the Catobar to be fitted so more aircraft can be utilised Thank You To Our American Cousins for The First deployment
Comment from : Mark Woods

The British have always been trend setters when it comes to aircraft carrier flight deck layout So nice that the British and US are such close allies who seamlessly share a substantial chunk of their military technologies and technology developments
Comment from : Phillip Mulligan

Before asking why, ask yes or no first plz😂
Comment from : 赵恺伦

WHAT A NICE COMPLIMENT to the RN GOD save the king
Comment from : JULES MARWELL

The QE class doesn’t operate F-35 B’s because it has no catapult or arrestor gear The ship actually has the infrastructure to (relatively) easily convert to a full catobar carrier It’s more so that training Pilots for catobar carriers is insanely expensive and difficult As well as having higher maintenance costs
Comment from : Joshua Taylor

It's a floating airfix model with a limited range, Vtol only aircraft (the worst variant of the F-35) and very few defensive capabilities aside from the radar systems how is she advanced? We've known how to build a Nuclear powered carrier since the 60's diesel is not advanced 72 aircraft is not impressive since again The US has been stuffing 90 fixed wing aircraft in carriers also since the 60's They have no missile defences Charles de Gaulle is more advanced, Admiral Kuznetsov is more "Advanced" than this and it's not even sea worthy They maybe squeak past the Juan Carlos
Comment from : Calum Henderson

hmmm, whats the defence against supersonic missiles?
Comment from : weasley potter

Imo the qe class ships are the most impressive out there at the moment very modern built around the f35 😎🇬🇧
Comment from : Bryan glover

Whoever narrates and whoever writes the script for this video needs to learn how to speak English properly
Comment from : Barny

Its not, doesn't have full squadrons of F35b's is not, cats and traps enabled, requires fuel that has to be carefully planned out in advance, in what way is this powerful ?
Comment from : alec cap

HMS Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales can hold up to 72 aircraft But unfortunately the UK government is so tight that they only state 32 aircraft The aircraft carriers only has 16 on bord mostly
Comment from : MrH

It has to be powerful to haul around that much dead weight playing "warrior"
Comment from : DEEREMEYER1

Air defense system is weak
Comment from : Rahul kumar Tiwari

What about the fujian
Comment from : maxi stanca

It's a shit aircraft carrier br1 f35 B is the weakest f35 series - low engine power, no gun, can carry only 4 air to air missilebr2 Queen Elizabeth classes carrier have no missile to defend itself from supersonic cruse missile br3 Underpowered in Every aspect
Comment from : VIGILANTE

cant wait for it to show up in azur lane 47
Comment from : alhosain taher

Because it has US fighter jets on it
Comment from : Chris Dean

4:34 "Almost 3 times biggest than the 'Invisible Class' carriers" (?!) 🤣
Comment from : Aeronaut

Inferior design and concept I remember, when this new class of carrier, the QE was advertised and promoted by the UK government and the Royal Navy as a CAT carrier! But as the years went by, it kept being defined down For example: it can't support Air to Air refueling That is very limiting on a carriers best ability,,, range of detection and strike That ability alone would extend the QE ability to strike by hundreds of miles And has the added benefit of safety for the ship
Comment from : Ray Whitehead

3 times bigger than the INVISIBLE class 😂😂
Comment from : DIDCOTTWIST

Shame one is broken after only a few years, and the UK still has no full aircraft compliment for 1 carrier, let alone the second that will be in dock for at least a yearbrBut will will continue to spend more that the cost of both carriers a year keeping illegal migrants in 4* hotels a year hahahaha
Comment from : phil smit

0:30 that feels like a shot at the Charles de Gaulle 😂
Comment from : Ariel Plaza

Lot of bla bla bla here Very little critical analysisbrSo to balance it out a bitbrThe ship needs 6 Vulcan Phalanx guns There are blind spots and not enough fire power to cope with a missile assault The ship needs anti missile defenses, those of the guard screen frigates and destroyers are inadequatebrThe ski slope design is a crap economy The original design with angled flight deck and ELS was better Why? The ship can't launch and recover the variety of planes it really needsbrIt should have had nuclear propulsion to provide enough energy for future weapons Could also have got rid of one of the chimney stack covers!brNow I wait the jingoistic replies from the emotionally involved
Comment from : Brian Arnold

Loved the reference to the Invisible class in the last moments of the film! I do wish narrators would stop saying The HMS - no The please!
Comment from : Lester May

If it doesn't break down
Comment from : John James McCartney

Ha ha ha must be some k8nd of joke
Comment from : Peter Fox

Yes, it’s “undoubtfully” a great ship
Comment from : BandBoxParade

Being a tier one contractor on the F-35's, we should be receiving them faster than we are!
Comment from : TGS Garden maintenance

JUST ONE HIGHPRECISION HYPERSONIC ANTI SHIP BALLISTIC MISSILES IS ENOUGH TO BLOW IT UP INTO A THOUSANDS MOLTEN IRON PIECES🤪🤪🤪😜😜
Comment from : Felipe Lim

Powerful ! means Naval Integrated Fire Control-Counter Air (NIFC-CA) making it one massive over the horizon threat that can see beyond its own ships sensors
Comment from : mountain dweller

At one time huge battleships were the most prestigious powerful warships in the world which is why every country wanted one and every other country targeted and sank the ones belonging to the countries that did have them That's why nobody has battleships any more
Comment from : Carol Ramsey

It's so advanced it has the ski ramp take off real advance
Comment from : Earl Garrett

Elizabeth is the most advanced while Ford is the most powerful
Comment from : fofoqueiro

Good and healthy debate here without neg agenda-based morons and influencers with an axe to grind Keep up the great work and bless
Comment from : Skeleton Key

Those "American aircraft" are actually 15 British technology & British made Much of the technology that went into the international design of those aircraft was what was planned for a speculative Harrier III, eventually cancelled in favour of the JSF program
Comment from : Dalex Horizon

Seems like a very good marine carrier like the WASP class?
Comment from : HypersonicMonkeyBrains

Very limited carrier can’t launch tankers to extend range of f35b, no real defence of her own except three phalanx guns …and one type of aircraft that can be deployed from her deck pretty crap
Comment from : Sparkiegaz

This HMS Banana Boat is not powerful at all… it’s 1970s technology… non-Nuclear, non-CAT, non-TRAP, non-AWACS, diesel burning, with that emasculated banana ramp is more comparable to the Russian Admiral Kuznetzov
Comment from : Ian Richards