Battlefield 1 Alpha PC - Ultra Graphics VS. Low Graphics

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о Battlefield 1 Alpha PC - Ultra Graphics VS. Low Graphics

Название	:	Battlefield 1 Alpha PC - Ultra Graphics VS. Low Graphics
Продолжительность	:	2.12
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	275 rb

It's weird, how in games like Battlefield 1 the graphics are so round and simplistic, making the general feel to the game as such and maybe further away from the original subject in the game In the previous days, there used to be different types of graphics available for the games and not relying only on one type in all games How the graphics in a war game should feel like, you can think for yourself brbrIt's like all the slowishness to the menus and to the game seem to come from this It's like the graphics would be so over-simple that they have hard time on following the complicated things and procedures that happen on the game, and because of this it slows down the reaction times and the responsiveness on the game You can't distinguish easily whether the slowness comes from your computer or from the graphics engine that has been used on the game It seems like this would be something that could be optimized or fixed, to skip to the more real performance challenges and away from the artificial overall slowdown effects
Comment from : banjo099

Even on lowest settings with TAA the game looks great
Comment from : Fantaji

I see no difference
Comment from : Starfall

they are same :D
Comment from : EfeWhiteMan

If you just wanna play battlefield you dont need the latest thing out there, just buy a mid range gaming pc or laptop with at least 8GB of ram and you will be rocking this game at 1080p ultra
Comment from : A S

i can't see the difference between
Comment from : Ilham Rahkman Riefda

Low Looks Better!!!!
Comment from : Kinggg

Can I run this?brMy specs:bri5-4460 32GHzbrGTX 1050 tibr8GB RAM
Comment from : Sentinel2539

I've played both ultra and low on my PC, and it has to be said, even at low graphics its quite pleasant on the eye, not as harsh as some games out there Was very playable for me, infact, I found myself switching it to low mode for multiplayer so I could see enemies further away easier (none of that lens flaring, bright lighting going on etc)
Comment from : Airtrooper719

low doesnt even look that bad
Comment from : Act3z

console gamer: oh shet is da seim shat !!
Comment from : Rovstam

Am I the only one who think that low graphic is like realistic than high graphic???It's like the low graphic have this blurry effect
Comment from : DelsinGaming

Guys i have a ps4 is it low or ultra?
Comment from : [UN]unlimitedninja 123

can my macbook pro 2012 13" run this game? brbrHere are the specs:brbrintel HD 4000 25 Ghzbr4gb DDR3 rambr500 GB Samsung Evo 850 SSDbrBootcamp Windows 10 Home
Comment from : CJ Evan

To be fair, low still looks great
Comment from : Hugo

All i saw as a difference was the teslassion being less pronounced and the reflection being reduced to a minimal ammount
Comment from : Vej

Low still looks better than console XD
Comment from : Craig Difonzo

no too much difference, but higher fps in low graphics
Comment from : tommy1910

This looks so cheap Piles of rubble or just low polygon lumps textured with a flat rubble texture
Comment from : K

Nothing different because I play in 144p
Comment from : Kjcomputer

I have a 1050ti so i just might go for low it looks exactly the same to ne
Comment from : tuureka

The only setting that should ever be ultra is mesh quality
Comment from : Will Newman (SuperOlk)

No different
Comment from : Ayoub

There is an extremely small difference not everyone will see The only thing i see is that some things are better textured on ultra than low but that is extremely small and I will happily play bf1 on low
Comment from : Arbalest

on ultrea, longgrass is shown
Comment from : Adam Mehdi

Intel® Core™ i5-7200U (25 GHz, up to 31 GHz, 3 MB cache, 2 cores)brMemory, standard 8 GB DDR4-2133 SDRAM (1 x 8 GB)brVideo graphics NVIDIA® GeForce® 940MX (4 GB DDR3 dedicated) DiscretebrbrCan I run it on mid low settings playable?
Comment from : Hehejel Lelrieieiderd

My PC is not that great, however i still run the game on ultra graphics, unfortunately not 200 graphics, but i see no major difference, on ultra some little details look better but they are realy unnoticableBTW could you please compare graphics of all of the battlefield games (Battlefield 1942 - Battlefield 1)?
Comment from : Dominique 9325

can't tell the difference
Comment from : The Horror

in my pc, the low settings seems to be muuuuuuuch inferior than this video
Comment from : André Luiz Teske

low > ultra
Comment from : TRBatuhanKara

watched it on 240p, see no difference
Comment from : M N H

dat feeling when u don't see any differencebecause you're watching at 144p xdddd
Comment from : alloutlife88

I only avail to see difference in grass quality
Comment from : hard codes

It's hard to tell the difference
Comment from : AqsaShock

Same
Comment from : Cavid Şükürlü

i dont see any diff
Comment from : DOPPY DOPOY

"There is no difference!"brbr-Peasant
Comment from : Minatozaki Doge

Is the difference worth the extra dollars for the hardware?
Comment from : unfa🇺🇦

Isn't enough of a difference so that you would buy a new graphics card
Comment from : Milolo20

I think there is no difference b/w them
Comment from : WHITECOAT MAVERICK VLOGS

Even low graphics looks like something that would cause my PC to catastrophically melt
Comment from : gradh

Hmmmm I barely see any difference :D other than AA of course!
Comment from : kam hagh

not a big diffarence
Comment from : neokr

Can I run? Specs brGTX 660brI3 processedbr8GB of rambr1000 gigs of storage
Comment from : BPBeats

the low setting is console
Comment from : ReLLaKaT

when the beta was out for pc, i had to play at lowest setting at 800x600 cus i didnt have a good gpu at the time, i had a gt 720 it was still very fun
Comment from : Perhaps

Wow - they are pretty much the same
Comment from : Joseph S

Turn on super sampling
Comment from : Flowcast

The only noticable thing i can see is better tesselation on the ground and more anti aliasing I wouldnt notice the ground tesselation untill i actually compared it though But the aa is kinda noticable Considering that 2x aa is usually fine, this looks great even at low settings
Comment from : SerdarCS

Ultra Graphics is for hd and 4k monitor, you will see the difference clearly when you play on TV
Comment from : Ali Feraoon

can I Play this game on NVidia Geforce 710m?
Comment from : saigonroll

funny how even low settings looks like console
Comment from : Tom J

laptop MSIbri7 6400k intel corebrGtx 960m br12gb RAM will i be able to run Bf1?
Comment from : Itsdatviet Guy

i just tried it on low you can make it look much worse lol
Comment from : Von

this is a joke right?
Comment from : Rick Chen

Can i run Battlefield1 with this?(cpu)brintel core i5br8GB rambrNVIDIA GEFORCE 2GB GT610 DDR3 PCI-E 20br??
Comment from : zNOTkyz

what kind of low are we talking about here?
Comment from : Dipu Rai

Lol there is almost no difference at all
Comment from : Raidzor

low is basically just consoles
Comment from : Howff_

for some reason the change of graphics doeasn't seem much but I have 40 fps more at low
Comment from : Lamampis

Looks exactly the same lmao
Comment from : Symbol :-)

in 1440p there is a huge difference, but I think that has more to do with anti aliasing
Comment from : Hijynx87

I feel like when they made ultra setting they were like nah I'm too lazy just have ultra you low setting skrubs
Comment from : R3D

Yeah lol hahah
Comment from : Soulaiman C

hi,i3 5005u 8gb RAM NVIDIA 920m2gb can i run ?how fps in low?
Comment from : Alejandro Sánchez

Hey guys,brWould I be able to run this game and at how many fps?brSpecs:brAmd a10 8700p (laptop)brRadeon R6 integrated graphics cardbr8 gb rambr500 mb video rambrThanks in advance
Comment from : TomSawyer1010

im going to buy this game soon,and i wonder how many fps do i get ?brim currently running on a 1600x900 res with this setupbrAthlon X4 760kbrGTX 960 2Gigs versionbrand 8 GB of ram
Comment from : Incurius Cognito

I barely notice a difference between the two!
Comment from : Esco

Wow i can play on low and don t see any differnces ^^ xd
Comment from : Flo

can i run it on low with 1080 ?brbrbrceleron G1620 270brbrGT 740 2gb DDR5 brbr12GB ram DDR3
Comment from : Mazen

I literally have the minimum specs to play this game (GTX 660, 8 GB ram, etc)brWhat frame rate could I expect from this game?brCan the settings go any lower than this? I don't mind loosing detail if it means I can get a solid 60 fps
Comment from : Rusted Can

Разнеци вообще не чуствую
Comment from : Игровой канал Yarika

I prefer to crank the graphics down and crank up the res scale, especially in this game got 2 GTX 970's and can run the game on ultra at 100 res scale but I think running everything medium/high and cranking up the res scale to 160 looks nicer
Comment from : Ares14

I can run battlefield 4 on high settings so can I run this atleast or low or medium
Comment from : Tarif C

Omg on Low there is an zeppelin and on Ultra it is gone :O
Comment from : TheFalladin

low quality? lol
Comment from : Thamindu kavinda

all it does is make it a bit less blurry
Comment from : Vedaddel

i only see it in the grass
Comment from : Riley

is it just me? i dont see a difference!
Comment from : pot bier

can I run in high with Nvidia GTX 750TI 2GB????
Comment from : TECAS

lmao there is absolutely NO difference between low and high except that high seems to have ever so slightly better textures and shinier guns
Comment from : Suhaas Chennapragada

almost no difference just set it to ultra, if you wanna make sure you get the best grephics if you get lag or low fps try setting it down to low it almost looks the same
Comment from : Tiogar

뭐야 재생이 안되잖아 나만그런가?
Comment from : 몰라

Even low Setting looks high Settings
Comment from : MAXIMUS

not too much difference
Comment from : D4ny

No comments?
Comment from : Chirayu Rana

ultra have more grass and higher textures!
Comment from : MrMovieMan941

low is actually ultra
Comment from : cgtalk !

Might as well not put any graphics settings if it's for them to look exactly the same
Comment from : Bob Marl

Still looks fantastic
Comment from : Blackadder

all people who don't see the difference are blind or console player
Comment from : TheCyril

When they are making low pc support seriously nobody wants to spend 1000$ on pc there are more important things like food job clothes etc
Comment from : That Tonnato guy with a FEZ