Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 | Review After Purchasing for Astrophotography and Landscape Photography

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 | Review After Purchasing for Astrophotography and Landscape Photography

Название	:	Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 \| Review After Purchasing for Astrophotography and Landscape Photography
Продолжительность	:	12.22
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	8 rb

Кадры Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 | Review After Purchasing for Astrophotography and Landscape Photography

Описание Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 | Review After Purchasing for Astrophotography and Landscape Photography

Коментарии Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 | Review After Purchasing for Astrophotography and Landscape Photography

I have looked through Bensound to find this gorgeous Background Track on this Video Will which section is it in ?? and what is it called once I get the right Section
Comment from : Peter Betts

Great honest review! Don't ever over do it Thanks
Comment from : Conrad L Braganza

Thanks for your honest review and best of luck going forwards from Ireland 🇮🇪
Comment from : NIkCan

This lens is impressive Way lighter than the older Nikon 14-24 28 and a solution to take filters I have an Olympus camera and the other zooms in the system do well with go light philosophy but the 7-14 28 is 534 grams which compared well to the old 14-24, but I think this new one Nikon is 620 grams which is pretty amazing since it covers the full frame sensor and everyone seems to be giving it top marks in their reviews If I switch systems in the future I may go to the Z mount to get this lens Thanks for the review
Comment from : Evan McKnight

I rented this lens for 7 days for my trip to Greece and Venice and to test it out and I dont think theyre even worth $1000 or 1300 EURbrI just do photography whenever i travel (im not an expert) and i found my ''Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm f/35-63 VR'' doing a better job than the 14-24mm I own a Nikon z50,brAt close distance it seemed as if I stepped a step back when I shot with the 14-24mm compared to the small 16-50mmbrAt medium distance (100-200m) it seemed like if i just added 5meters on my right side and left sidebrAt long distance (kilometers away), you can see a difference but it does not justify $1000 for USA and let alone 1300EUR in Europebrbr brMaybe i just expected too much of an ''ultra wide angle lens"? From pictures ive seen in the internet it looks like this lens would fix all the problems you have by fitting EVERYTHING in the picture beautifully Anyways I still think my 16-50mm lens ($250) outperforms this wide angle lens brOr did i do something wrong?brLike i said, im not an expert or anything on photography, and maybe me and real photographers have different expectations for lensesbredit: i also found my16-50mm($250) being sharper than the ultra wide angle lenses when zooming into the picutre for far objects
Comment from : Leo Casi

Your photos are mind blowing Bravo
Comment from : Sebastian Michalski

nice! :) thanks for the update love the milky way pano! still saving money for this astro beast 🤩also, i can't wait for an update/video on filters on the lens, especially some data on vignetting/sharpness etc would be a blast! what external shutter are you using? best, nicolas
Comment from : Nicolas

I really would love to pick up this lens Only problem is that it likely will not fit well on my old D90 haha But seriously would love to pick up this lens and decide on a body later, it is just so great looking
Comment from : SpaklesDr

I chose the 20mm f18 > far brighter at f18 than f28 at the Milky Way but that 14 - 24 is a beaut but I use the 14-30 f4 as my landscapes are shot at f8-say f16
Comment from : Peter Betts

Thanks Will, for your insight into this lens, I have bought it as well I am working in Holland but I am travelling home to Scotland tomorrow so will be able to get my hands on it Saturday for the first time Can't wait to try it out for landscapes Keep up the good work
Comment from : thomas fox