Michael Hastings Cremated, Family Never Requested It

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о Michael Hastings Cremated, Family Never Requested It

Название	:	Michael Hastings Cremated, Family Never Requested It
Продолжительность	:	3.18
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	3,6 rb

Was there an autopsy report, no matter what state the body always detailed report on state of remains
Comment from : widdy waddy

Would there even be much of a body other than bones to autopsy after being subjected to the automobile fire for several minutes? It does seem unusual to cremate someone without permission of next of kin/spouse It's not the first death of a high-profile person in LA county
Comment from : JayGoldenBeach

Continued Doesn't the fact that you think its physically impossible that a newspaper that probably went out of business years ago didn't digitize all their media that they put out decades ago Show a real lack of skepticism on your part? You have a preconceived notion that everything is digitized And cite only anecdotal evidence So you think its more likely that I've gone mad and have false memories and that I need to be more skeptical of my own memories?
Comment from : GhostInTheShell29

So your saying I shouldn't believe anything I've read that wasn't later digitized? That anything not digitized never happened? In my personal example I gave I have the real answers But I can't prove them So why would I break the law to reveal the real answers knowing that I would face legal issues for doing so, and at the same time not convince the public of its truth? Which is why many cops don't come forward, they aren't involved but why should they risk their lives to achieve nothing?
Comment from : GhostInTheShell29

Did you listen to what I said? Newspapers and TV stations have digitized their archives My local paper has the past 100 years of material available online And it's not about you giving bad example --it's about you not having any desire to search out real answers I'm complaining about your lack of skepticism
Comment from : dudev

Or it was simply never uploaded? I don't get why you think your proving something here I said it was in a newspaper, yet your searching online I never found it online either Otherwise I'd have just thrown you a link I also brought it up simply as an analogy Just like I brought up some of the Iranian cover ups Yet you never responded to the point of the analogies, just keep complaining about me giving you a bad example
Comment from : GhostInTheShell29

I searched between 1960 to 1990 Nothing like what you describe A couple of home suicides by former CIA employees, but nothing about a body found in or near water Must have been "redacted" by the "man"
Comment from : dudev

Umm thats 2 decades too late, and the story itself mentions that the police suspect he tied weights to his feet, and tied his own hands behind his back, and committed suicide in such a way that he would fall off the boat when he shot himself in the head
Comment from : GhostInTheShell29

So your saying because something that happened before the internet, isn't on the internet That it never happened? I suppose it was a bad example of me to give, but like I said, many people know about it, a lot more people used to read newspapers back in those days, and many could easily connect the dots But just because people know Doesn't mean there's easily available proof, or that there will ever be an official investigation, as there never was
Comment from : GhostInTheShell29

You don't need a name to find a news story about a dead body found off of Baltimore I actually did a search for it, and there's nothing even remotely similar to what you described
Comment from : dudev

If I knew the name of the person it might be searchable But I don't was a long time ago sorry Like I said in my military example, yeah I can't prove it Doesn't mean I wasn't there, doesn't mean I didn't experience it first hand Doesn't mean it wasn't real Yet to even release what I know would be illegal And since I know I can't prove anything I remain silent on the issue So even though I know, doesn't mean I'm in on it Just like cops might know, but say nothing
Comment from : GhostInTheShell29

"That story was pre-internet age" Are you kidding me? Vast news collections for the past 200 years have been digitized I've searched news articles on Google from the mid 1800's "Generally a lot of people know when a conspiracy takes place" It's not much of a conspiracy if everyone knows about it Like I said, you're assuming "they" are idiots and make obvious mistakes "Its not what you know its what you can prove" Yeah, and you can't prove jack squat
Comment from : dudev

That story was pre-internet age It was page 15 or so of the Baltimore paper Generally a lot of people know when a conspiracy takes place, but who cares? Its not what you know its what you can prove As a soldier in Iraq I learned the truth about the allegations of Iranian assistance to the Iraqi Insurgents There was solid physical proof of these things, but we turned it all in like were supposed too So even though many people know, no one cares since all we have is our word
Comment from : GhostInTheShell29

If you guys would have spent more time investigating the way the establishment treated ron paul instead of criticizing him, you could easily accept the idea that Hastings eas killed This is how these evil people work
Comment from : drummeroake

Wait so your saying the evidence of a conspiracy is proof it wasn't a conspiracy? You wouldn't need any cops to be in on it You just tell them not to investigate It was a while back, but a dead body belonging to a former CIA agent was found in Baltimore harbor, he had concrete shoes and his hands tied behind his back The police ruled it a suicide They weren't in on the plot, they just did as they were told
Comment from : GhostInTheShell29

We're not talking about breadcrumbs of evidence We're talking about huge mistakes that supposedly make a case look suspicious to even the most amateurish of conspiracy theorists I would have thought a government agency with endless resources and expertize wouldn't make obvious errors The national clearance rate for murders is about 60 In some cities it's 30 Why make up an overly elaborate plan with car bombs and corrupt cops, when one guy with a gun will do? Conspiracies make no sense
Comment from : dudev