How SpaceX Will Test 29 Raptor Engines

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о How SpaceX Will Test 29 Raptor Engines

Название	:	How SpaceX Will Test 29 Raptor Engines
Продолжительность	:	7.34
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	1,8 jt

When do you think Starship will launch in 2022? - Shout out to CuriosityStream for supporting this vid! Check out curiositystreamcom/PrimalSpace
Comment from : Primal Space

Goddamn watching those old starship videos makes clear how rapid the progress is with that rocket
Comment from : Micha Grill

2:34 the version of the n1s that flew had engines that used pyrotechnics to ignite so they physically couldn't fire the booster or even test individual engines prior to launch
Comment from : SpaceMan225

As much power as a Saturn 5?
Comment from : Joel Cairo

tap tham khao truong đai hoc triet hoc , nuoc anh ,hop đien wifi
Comment from : Sam Zem

Every time I hear the conversation about colonizing Mars I ask my self if we are willing to survive only by what we need, why don’t we have that same mentality on earth? brThis is aside from “colonizing” brI’m talking about the ones who suggest on leaving earth for a “better” life
Comment from : Termi_888

You are a prophet 😮 spacex please learn
Comment from : Varun Muthukumar

Watching this video a year after publishing is telling Blows my mind that they knew the possible issues but decided to risk it Makes me wonder if we would already be talking about the next planned launch date had the pad infrastructure been better
Comment from : josh g

I'm more concerned about the Launch Pad itself
Comment from : wxb200

Нихуя не понял Но очень интересно!
Comment from : Steven Kregen

uhhh… well he predicted what happened
Comment from : JustAChiefsFan

Your predictions were accurate!!!!
Comment from : Joseph Mwenjeri

It has 33 engines but okay
Comment from : LeM0

Simple for is to dig deep beneath the base of the stand And deep Dow put flame divert or and water so the flames don’t heat up the engines them self
Comment from : Fahad Ali

Cheap American propaganda downplaying Russian technology quoting some failed rockets Even NASA used the most successful rocket system history, Soyuz which completed 1700 flights to space, while seven of the 33 raptor engines failed during the recent launch Russian technology is simple, powerful and reliable Anyway American fireworks are more spectacular though
Comment from : Sha Sha

Is there an engineering reason why SpaceX doesn't have flame / debris diverter?brIt seems to be much simpler to just build one on the launchpad (which is on the ground than hoping no debris will travel back and damage the engines or rocket structurebrI found this video way too late, after the first launch of starship and could see a lot of problems (debris flying here and there uncontrolled) in the first 15 seconds itself which could easily have been prevented
Comment from : Nyx Awesome

Actually it is a very poor design and put together this super heavy rocket The more engines the greater problems Should design a bigger engine and put just 3 engines or max 4 engines but not so many small engine I think they are lazy to redesign from scratch and make super heavy engine for this rocket
Comment from : Hop Lam

엔진 숫자를 줄여야 됨 추력은 올리면서
Comment from : 왕오빠

I cannot believe it managed to go so far with 5 engines out Incredible work So much data gathered now Guess theyll be looking to why the stages didn't separate and how the Raptor engines can all reliably ignite and sustain good thrust Should good for another launch hopefully soon!
Comment from : Will Graham

Oh come on rockets are 1940 / 50s technology, boring We know that Anti-gravity systems have been developed Come Elon Musk you know this
Comment from : Barrie Grey

last time a Rocket with 30 Engines was launched was in 1974, the last attempt to launch the Russian N1 Moon Rocket It just about made it so the End of the First Stage's Lifetime, when it, like the 3 prior, blew up Too bad, I would have liked to see the Russians get to the Moon
Comment from : pjimmbo jimmbo

31*
Comment from : Ishan Mohile

They did it! 31 Engine successful static fire!!!
Comment from : Harshil FTW

If it takes 14 tons of fuel to light the engines for 3 seconds, divide 14 by three and you need 46 tons for 1 second and for a minute? 280 Tons
Comment from : Jennifer Guenter

“The reason it has so many engines is because if 1 engine fail it can still work”brSea dragon rocket: oh well, never mind 😳
Comment from : Win Win

The 28 or so engines on this remind me of the failed Russian moon ricket the N2! All of them failed! Mmmmm
Comment from : Da R

Nerd I like that one
Comment from : AnanAk477

What star is the ship going to?
Comment from : DEB B

Connected engine
Comment from : Torvmoen Bcc

29 rocket engines Ok this is really interesting if it gets off ground Las Vegas needs to make odds on thismore than likely will blow up pad More than likely it will be a year or more If ever it gets off ground
Comment from : David Breihan

When you build your first big rocket in Kerbal Space Program
Comment from : xygomorphic44

Me in space flight simulator 🤣
Comment from : dont subscribe me mf

I want to stay on earth and preserve my brain
Comment from : Zzz Zzz

To be honest, I thought the thumbnail was a click bait picture, but it is not!
Comment from : 2Glock30s

KSP players:- That's a normal project in kerbal society
Comment from : Prime number Buster

What about artimis 1?
Comment from : Crimson_x

@K
Comment from : dxt artist

Mỗi lần thử nghiệm khá là tốn kém!
Comment from : An Tahsi

This will never work
Comment from : Ha mince alors

what did Elon do to compensate for the CO2 emissions from rockets
Comment from : Qwertyu

The capital cost involved in these experiments are really exorbitant and the results out of which are pretty not exemplary Just look at those wooping price tags for each rockets Not even dare to equate with NASA's budget If US tax payers let them much similar capital to NASA, they would have brought up many magics out of thin air As they have shown in the past Since Elon Musk sitting on a couple of hundred Bn$ fortune,he could spend as like he want But quantity and efficiency will not go at parbrEspecially in terms of cost effectivenessthis man is not even in the orbit brbrIf one tenth or one twentieth portion is awarded to ISRO they would also produce magnificent results That's efficiencythis is wasting capitalbr#NASA#ISRO
Comment from : Basil K P

Elon Musk: lets put 30 engine on this:brafter construction is finishedbralso Elon Musk: nah never mind there isn't space for the 30th one
Comment from : DEVESHCreative

"29 Raptor engines" seems like a typical SFS player
Comment from : Sangita Chakraborty

🕶
Comment from : Usaps5

Correction: 33 engines!!
Comment from : Nirbhay Raghav

"*ONLY 14 TONS OF METHANE*"
Comment from : Mahbub Baschu

i live down the road from the boca Chica facility
Comment from : omar barbosa

The biggest problem with human space flight is the fact that the radiation makes astronauts infertile The way around is to user artificial insemination to create offspring brAs DNA gets damaged the males become impotent and unable to ejaculate This is nature’s way of not letting damaged DNA re-procreatebrWe send the brightest people up there and make them infertile! We want to send tourist into space, but we have to do it save! No insurance company will insure an operator that brings back impotent males and infertile females brVery few people actually will go into space when the main side effect is impotence!
Comment from : Alex

Hahaha thief
Comment from : P HO

when i goto toilet in a few minutes, i will created the first piece of shit this kind ever made in human history
Comment from : Andy Hüwe

Feels like rockets fell off a cliff with innovation, from the WW's, until Elon Or some seriously cool shit was discovered, and hidden, so rockets became unnecessary to those "Innovators"
Comment from : Josh

think itll be louder than NASA's SLS?
Comment from : M

ไปได้แน่ๆครับผมยอดเยี่ยมครับผม
Comment from : ประมวล กลิ่นจันทน์

Not Prectical
Comment from : No One

I dont understand why they spend so much money building rockets and missions to outer space and mars habitation Why not imstead build a rocket that can destroy killer asteriods in path with Earth
Comment from : NoSide

N1 20
Comment from : Mike208pug

Excellent presentation, very informative
Comment from : Roger Swyer

I thought service station but by the way moon go seems there should be better way not sure how it accelerate in no gravity
Comment from : 세로TV

Whoa whoathey're gonna catch it?
Comment from : Cherokee140Driver

you sound like patrick bateman
Comment from : Leon Steffens

What kind of mastering physics this rocket and the pad technology might it be if even sound waves are so strong to be tamed by water 💦 ? I have the feeling that it’s some kind of - hard to describe - aggregation of mastering of mathematics and physics times aspiration to be outstanding and keeping it as “simple” and modular as it could be , which in itself is I believe very very very hard to achieve at SpaceX But I won’t forget Tesla (and the other Companies involved, too many to mention) thanks 🙏 for sharing the knowledge I always happy to see what’s achieved next in a hopefully healthy way for all who are involved I really would like to see Sandy Munro deconstruct a Raptor Engine 😁 , but don’t tell the secret’s I really would like to know what his overall opinion would be in just 8 minute long sums up 🙏☮️ Best wishes and Grüße aus Frankfurt am Main
Comment from : Sa5cha

Sfs in real life
Comment from : WATERMELON PUDDING

I still can't wrap my head around the fact that we have to basically start over from walking on the moon just 50 years prior is just amazing to me
Comment from : Beast mode

Why these scientists and their investors also find out a solution to save the earth?
Comment from : Rajendra Verma

a horizontal test fire would send shockwaves for miles beyond the 'burn' zonebrbrthey're gonna need to move the workshop to Mars
Comment from : DursunX

Einmal voll tanken
Comment from : Giuseppe

Trick question, answer is never since Biden's FAA won't ever give them launch approval
Comment from : Dan Hill

Carefully, with the longest blue touchpaper in history
Comment from : Paul ONeill

Good luck to ozone layer over there
Comment from : Sou

sorry too many engines too many failure points usa got it right with the F1
Comment from : Eric Fuhrer

I can’t wait for one of these to blow up
Comment from : andybaldman

your description of the N-1 will be the same for Starship
Comment from : Nash

why no diverter?brits a "once and done" cost that would protect all future tests/flights
Comment from : Sigh Phi Guy

Think that is the reason for the off shore oil rig perchasespurchasesbrAlso would cut down on collateral damage
Comment from : david diehl

RS-25s are better Raptors 👎
Comment from : Sachin A

when you can't make a good engine)) set 100500 raptors lol
Comment from : Mike Suri

They like to say the massive number of engines is redundancy,but the truth is,they couldn't build an engine as good as the Mighty F1! They couldn't even reverse engineer one from a pristine unflown F1!
Comment from : tom cline

Una maravilla de la ingeniería astronautas orgullosos de su tecnología gracias a elon musk
Comment from : Yris argentina Nuñez morillo

What is the difference between Supported and Sponsored videos?
Comment from : monkh 2002

This is a solution in search of a problem
Comment from : Richard Coughlin

SpaceX team is BOSS
Comment from : JD Nicoll

In the middle of a wildlife refuge This pointless crap
Comment from : Breck the Panther

Rocket return : wing strech drop, arm catch, spline funnel drop, water bouyant , air craft thruster , parachutes, spring head ^impact,dual concentric barell vessels, retractable protection shell,etc etc
Comment from : Kalpesh Wani

la beast
Comment from : Stonks

14 tons of fart gas is a bit too much isn't it?
Comment from : Marc

Yes,but it's only 28,000 lbs
Comment from : Thomas Ferguson

The rocket SpaceX so big so we make a lot of rocket engines?
Comment from : stickman clone to help

Am i the only who thinks that it looks like someone tried making a kerbal space program rocket? Damn someone must be all the games in area 51
Comment from : AefexzKanuto

Love the la beast music at the end Very nastalgic
Comment from : I I

Falcon 9 first launch went off PERFECTLY ???? They had 3 failures!!!
Comment from : Daniel McCrae

2010????? Wasn’t it 2018? Like I just googled it falcon 9 launch was may 11 2018 I remember watching it in senior year of HS I live in central fl
Comment from : YAMJAMZ