The Last of Us Part I AMD FSR 2 vs. DLSS

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о The Last of Us Part I AMD FSR 2 vs. DLSS

Название	:	The Last of Us Part I AMD FSR 2 vs. DLSS
Продолжительность	:	0.14
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	227 rb

there is a price there is an item Nvidia👍
Comment from : RezaNZ

FSR looks smashable enough
Comment from : Debeneek Rai

yeah amd is really goşng slow but fsr 30 is really good tho
Comment from : TheMeteAdam

No hace falta ponerlo en súper slow motion jajaja
Comment from : Adal Cardozo

Wait for new afmf
Comment from : Quess_

dlls best
Comment from : ugur ışık

This technology basically reduce resolution to get more "fps" What a scam
Comment from : Al Vr

That film grain tho 💀
Comment from : Clem

Smash
Comment from : One Minute of Anything

Fsr looks better
Comment from : todogaming779

man i just like the fps not the graphics
Comment from : Chuyanzz banuag

Include XeSS as well
Comment from : lord shitpost

People who say amd is better because they "care" about all imagine if they are using iphone
Comment from : Ahmed Jey

Ps5 is the best confirmed
Comment from : Janne S

Name game ??
Comment from : MOHA_AMED ^-^

Mó bonitinha a Ellie
Comment from : Ismael Santos

invidia wins
Comment from : ma_k31

Still the most useless "feature" in the world, it can only be useful if you play in 4k, for the rest both makes the games look ugly and with artifacts just for a few fps increase, they still need to work a lot on both tecnologies
Comment from : sirsiver

I hope FSR3 will be added to Minecraft, because my built-in laptop video core is not capable of anything 🥲
Comment from : AnoNim

I am rooting for AMD for atleast providing alternative for everyone though it's not perfect
Comment from : Modnar M

both look awful dlss is just a little less awful
Comment from : coringa77

Both are trash compare to native
Comment from : Coldbreathful

DLSS is blurry for distant objects, while FSR is more pixelated when zoomed in 4x and slow-mo
Comment from : Yak

Nothing Beats Nvidia🤘🏻
Comment from : iRebel

Yes I always play my games with my nose against the monitor
Comment from : Sami Khalloufi

In game you'll never see the difference
Comment from : MëD Black Black

for the price fsr is better
Comment from : Oussama Knani

L Nvidia, AMD for life ❤
Comment from : salv0

the same
Comment from : Dmitrii Petrychenko

Wtf? Both shiiit glad i got 4090, dont need nasty fsr or dlss
Comment from : charizard6969

can you do Fs3 comparison?
Comment from : Davide Allegrucci

FSR is better
Comment from : Nightek1

GeForce RULES 👍🏻
Comment from : STE999

You can make it softer with fsr just go under 20 not necesary to go above 20
Comment from : Supaire

Is it me or did they change her face? Wasn’t her face supposed to based off of ellen page?
Comment from : SeanDiPaul

The real difference is found when the games are in motion FSR breaks down way more
Comment from : Colemin

Just wait until fsr 3
Comment from : Papi sito jà loco má fręn

What resolution, what setting? This is pure nonsense otherwise Also objectively DLSS > anything AMD has because of AI cores on RTX GPUs FSR is welcome on older cards for sure
Comment from : jedenzet

Yes, rather than Nvidia alone, it's more exciting if AMD can scare Nvidia or Intel to make it more exciting and we're ready to enjoy it all
Comment from : Alexander Santoso

Ofc Nvidia looks better but its using dedicated technology to accomplish this while AMD is done strictly through the driver Meaning, literally any PC can use FSR Given the choice it's a no brainer to go with DLSS but not everyone has $800 for a 30 or 40 gen card As a buyer of the 30 series card, I do not feel that these small advantages warrant such a insane price tag I keep saying it but this time I am for real, the next card I get will be ANYTHING but Nvidia
Comment from : WeeebleWobble

For rescaled images I go back to consoles, it's cheaper, now we pay for basic GPUs and good AI software
Comment from : JuAnK2390

A gente quase nunca olha pro rosto da Ellie e sempre q olha ela esta com um olhar de preocupação ou de tristeza
Comment from : Monster

FSR 20 or 22?
Comment from : Skorp

No DLSS is always the best modern devs are lazy AF
Comment from : Eldred

Bruh their both staring at wach other, looking down ans the other looking up 😂brbrWas like "whats the point?"
Comment from : Seddy Amba

Fun fact: amd is not use extra cores for fsr technology 🍷
Comment from : montajpostz

next DLSS 35 vs FSR3
Comment from : Penonton

Cara de" acá no hay bija"😂😂
Comment from : Alejandro Almeida

just nvidia
Comment from : DARKSUN

Still would be Amd because they actually make stuff for everyone not just their customers
Comment from : Dosdragon

She's looking so sad😢
Comment from : Елена Волкова

Nvidia looks better
Comment from : onee

fsr 3 not out yet
Comment from : zxdt

АМД выглядит круче!
Comment from : NightXO

AMD Grafikkarte die hatten mich gefickt wirklich bitte niemand kaufen AMD GRAFIKKARTE
Comment from : Dead Empty

You might have a good PC but I think it might be the worst monitor why you sneak my own TV 4K as you can better quality picture
Comment from : DumpsterChild

I would just advise not zooming in to 200 whilst gaming folks and you will be fine jeez
Comment from : Acconda

sli is better than crossfire
Comment from : TurqoiseCorgi

Челам ниже реально нравится картинка с вырвиглазной резкостью?)
Comment from : de_fault-

Yes, but what gpus
Comment from : Macim

AMD 제발 힘내라
Comment from : 자몽

I think fsr look better but is really hard to tell
Comment from : stachu dzikus

They’re the same but if we are talking about ray tracing that is what Nvidia does best
Comment from : Diamond12

im not seeing a huge difference
Comment from : B16B0SS

Still missing fsr 3
Comment from : Calistenia infinita

ninguem vai jogar dando zoom mesmo hahahahha
Comment from : James Jerpherson

Very nice Now let's see it in motion
Comment from : rgb

Console gamers: its looks the same manbrPC gamers: i'll wait for the 5090rtx for better resolution
Comment from : Kasdim Fer

Song:anxiety by neffex
Comment from : sebasgraun

Оно все плохо и оптимизация и технологии 😢
Comment from : Вячеслав Мищенко

And everyone hating on nvidea haha
Comment from : DieAKING

Both of these boys look very miserable
Comment from : 0002pA

Se ve del asco
Comment from : Thanatos Simte

you get what you pay for 🤷‍♂️
Comment from : Irving

Dlss has a terrible artifact if you use flashlight Fsr is also better in motion, 4 some reason dlss and taa looks blurry in motion
Comment from : IrulAnnaba

what is this game name
Comment from : Shu

Can’t wait for the new fsr3
Comment from : Ali

Evidentemente el DLSS es mejor que el FSR sin embargo la diferencia no me parece tan grande ya que para notarlo hay que hacerle mucho zoom a la captura de lo contrario nadie notaría esa diferencia
Comment from : Ezio24

FSR 2 is better as far as my experience goes
Comment from : Ivan Iliev

Ñ
Comment from : vic_pic1402

solo que se ve un poco granulado desde lejos sin hacer zoom ok ok ok me sirve
Comment from : Rafael Groves

Yes but what dlss are u using ? Amd is decent btw
Comment from : BL4CKL1ST

А когда то я впервые узнал что такое hullhd😅 Тогда для меня мир перевернулся А теперь мы разглядываем пиксели через микроскоп😅😊
Comment from : AltREGO

wait until they release fsr 3
Comment from : MaxShmel

Those special cores can have the potential to pass certainloads to the gpu like ambient occlusion Some games can run better without dlss Depends how the devs optimise their game I played spider man with dlaa and got better performance than dlls but using taa also yielded better results with vastly better picture image than dlssbrbrIn all honesty taa and smaa are one of the best forms of image processing
Comment from : Rouge-123