Panasonic Lumix G9 II Review: Better than Canon R7!

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о Panasonic Lumix G9 II Review: Better than Canon R7!

Название	:	Panasonic Lumix G9 II Review: Better than Canon R7!
Продолжительность	:	19.38
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	33 rb

Visit our sponsor Adorama at sdpio/adorama to buy your cameras, lenses & more!brBuy the Panasonic G9 II at SDPio/G92brBuy the Panasonic 100-400 at SDPio/P100400brBuy the Canon R7 at SDPio/R7brBuy the Canon 100-500 at SDPio/C100500
Comment from : @TonyAndChelsea

It is now about 3 years since I sold off my Canon full frame & APSC (1Dx & 7D II) and my L glass, and invested in MFT (Lumix G9 & mix of Lumix, Olympus, Laowa, Sigma, Voigtlander lenses) plus I adapt my Zeiss & Nikkor glass, plus Canon tilt/shift brbrBest decision of my life The smaller lenses is a big deal The lens choices is a big deal I look forward to being able to afford the G9 II at some point
Comment from : @artistjoh

This video were taken with AWB Thus, the skin tone various seriesly from scene to scene Being the top professional photographers, you should not make public video in such low quality visional presentation This is time to switch from AWB to manul white balance photo and video
Comment from : @raywu6787

the Canon lenses are much larger and cost WAY more The canon also has has the rolling shutter problems How is the weather sealing on the canon? Panasonic is usually really good Also how is the audio quality? Panasonic hiatorically has really good audio pre-amps and their prpfession XLR hotshoe accesorie Several canon cameras have been shown to have noisy pre-amps and poor audio features If anyone has insight to those categories, please comment Thanks
Comment from : @np-ql2ih

Good job team!,thanks for sharing
Comment from : @luissalazar2021

Thanks guys
Comment from : @bcBiz

I don't get why the M43 bodies aren't significantly smaller in size
Comment from : @nubscrub

Nothing beats the OM-1, simple as that
Comment from : @mazaribeiro

They say m43 is cheaper but it ends up being a wash I need to buy more storage because my “keeper rate” is so much higher It allows me to get the shot I want when I want and has amazing handling I don’t miss FF at all and sold all of my FF gear
Comment from : @awksedgreep

So MFT is not dead
Comment from : @PabloMatsumoto

MFT isn't dead? Apparently money talks
Comment from : @maxsam201

Are these the same people that predicted that micro four thirds would die like 4 years ago? 😂brbrCan’t take them seriously ngl
Comment from : @danny_r27

Om - 1 has a stacked sensor an built in ND filter
Comment from : @bjornbjornson9359

Annnnnnddddd can we just kill m43 please? Innovate or die This comparison was the typical m43 fan club hype 100MP? Anyone wanna talk about chewing up needless space and all the rest of the drawbacks in actual usage? And only for static images? Long exposures how is this reducing work to get proximate images? And forget the promise of compactness - the big selling point of the early 2010s for m43 has been tossed out the window It's playing endless catching up rather than accepting what it is: good at small images There is zero reason to abandon the causal shooter market and trying to be be a pro-DSLR 1" sensors cameras are eating into m43 territory and it's going to be worse with more AI and such with a better price point m43 needs to get clever and defend the home turf It will not sway the larger sensor market and the numbers don't lie
Comment from : @mengshun

G9ii is just glorious Proud Lumix user since 2009! Never looked back
Comment from : @MrJapanforce

This Channel is so hard to watch most days It could be the m4/3s hate channel
Comment from : @jay-by1se

At 15:00 You Said, the Panasonic has lower Details brThe Pictures are Taken by ISO 1250 brThe Canon Had ISO 1000 brbrThat is one of the anwsers for the lower Details
Comment from : @menschmeier3799

nice quality video what camera recording pls let me know thanks
Comment from : @sofiaPenxa

And micro 4/3 is not dead
Comment from : @dollarinhand3443

Anyone : I enjoy those holidays so much, with that amazing view on thebrTony : Yeah but let's talk about bRolling shutter/bbrEveryone : Why ???
Comment from : @bobcoco6047

It's not the body--it's the smaller/lighter lenses that is the raison d'être for MFT! I much prefer the way my G9 I feels to any OM or Sony "FF" body as I find the latter too small for comfort/security I also much prefer MFT to any other format for a number of reasons, but that's a topic best discussed separately Also, there are many aspects of the G9 II not covered here (eg, low light/high-ISO performance improvements)brbrI have the "old" Leica 100-400 and am considering the new one as it's up to 2X TC-compatible, so that's 1,600mm EFL (while retaining the 13m/427' minimum focusing distance for a 10X true macro from a "safe" distance--compare that to APS-C, much less "FF") I'm considering the "Mk II" (as well as the Mk III version of the 35-100 f/28) when I get my G9 II, but I'd like to see more reviews firstbrbrBtW, I've very rarely experienced rolling shutter with my G9 I, and I almost always use the e-shutterbrbrI'll have to check out those Maven filters
Comment from : @ddsdss256

Massive improvement in auto focus for the Lumix for surebrbrDo you think that micro jitter that happened with moving targets will get improved with firmware update?
Comment from : @PolluxChung

Olympus was dead in the worst imaginable time Mft can be much more compact than apsc and judging the success of Fuji and her x100v the room for a compact, well made, stabilized, retro camera is here
Comment from : @Nulrom

put an m43 sensor in an ff body, just doesn't make sense
Comment from : @kevc2958

I would have preferred to see an OM-1 vs G92
Comment from : @drtod

Hi Very nice video Also, check your referral link on the g9 Does not seem to work All others do
Comment from : @shawnebrown

Nice video but how good is the Peaking for use of non-electronic lenses?
Comment from : @avarmadillo

Look art the glare coming off the book at around 16:40 in your unboxing video test In the Panasonic shots the glare through the face on the book is far less so this is not a fair test The Canon shot had a lot more severe glare on the book cover and this is what made it more difficult for the Canon to focus I'm a Micro 4/3 shooter, so I want the Panasonic to Winn in this and all other tests brIn the waterfall test you dismissed the Panasonic results because of medicare filter That's also kind of chicken s___ Tony, as you could have repeated the test from a different angle, removing the filter so you couldn't blame it on the filter
Comment from : @lawrencebeck4777

I'll be able to afford the Panasonic G9 mk II to replace my original G9 about when the Panasonic G9 mk III shows up oh well
Comment from : @spudwas

Is the autofocus on the G9 II as good as the OM-1?
Comment from : @danieldougan269

OM-1 still looks better
Comment from : @LarryFasnacht

I sold my r7 for the om1 best decision !
Comment from : @skipcampbell239

tony praise m4/3? Am I dreaming? please someone slap me back to reality Now, i expect Fro will do the same :)
Comment from : @evernam993m8

Respectfully, no one cares enough for the industry to grow through new camera sales New camera photos are no better than mine We don’t scrutinize like you do
Comment from : @howardchud9097

and your the guy who said micro 4/3was dead a few years ago ,
Comment from : @PearTreePictures1950

How does it work with older 4/3 lenses?
Comment from : @petepictures

But, look at the sizes of the lens Not much difference now in camera body sizes Apsc and full frame lenses are HUGE Tthe lens size is now what i go on Compare the olympus 12-45mm to anything other than micro 43rds
Comment from : @toke7560

Very interesting at the waterfall
Comment from : @rocksandoil2241

It's funny that the focusing sequences demonstrating the G9 II are so totally different from all the other reviewers Or is it?
Comment from : @rayjennings3637

Sorry guys, but Micro Four Thirds is all but dead in the water I don’t know anybody who owns or uses MFT
Comment from : @DavidDatura

Thanks tony now i know lumix is still under development of phase AF😢
Comment from : @dimitrimoonlight

Was the video sponsored by Adorama by any chance? You should have said! 😆
Comment from : @Nick_G7IZR

Tony, may I remind you what you said a few years ago about the m43 system? Don't make an ass out of your mouth, the internet doesn't forget 🤑
Comment from : @user-dt7qi2ud3i

Comparing R7 32 meg vs the use case for G9II 100 meg is the wrong comparison to make here haha Is it surprising there's more detail? nope That comparison literally makes zero sense Comparing a normal image from the G92 to the 100 meg is interesting But the comparison between the R7 and G92 should be in the maximum photo size it can normally take
Comment from : @RoadRunner27

I have no idea why the video title says better than Canon R7 as if the Canon R7 is the camera to beat lol Canon cannot compete with panasonic for features and how the company treats it's customers Canon truly are a lousy company who like to manufacture flaws into their cameras like 8k and 4k overheating after such a short time with long recovery times
Comment from : @pgtips4240

Was your G9II a pre-production copy?
Comment from : @Orion13Moon

If you want expensive m43rds lenses, go look at Leica
Comment from : @PaulMansfield

Does the G9II work with the Olympus Pro lenses?
Comment from : @forester_overland_nz

Could you please consider comparing Sony A6700 with LUMIX G9 II?
Comment from : @AprilClayton

Why are some of your shots so over exposed? brDo you have an intern behind the camera?
Comment from : @mcsnapples

Canon should really open it to 3rd party lens manufacturer
Comment from : @andrewkawlni6125

Thank you for this informative and expert review
Comment from : @nndoorgaans

The launch of the G9II is a significant boost for the m43 community Recently, I've made a full transition back from Sony FF to m43 Virtually everything you can do with Fullframe can also be achieved with m43, but with less weight (which becomes increasingly important as you get older) and less intimidating to the surroundings The video quality of the GH6 is impressive and fantastic to work with However, compact and yet excellent cameras like the GX9 are pleasant companions for a day out Naturally, the G9II (with its much-improved AF) is on my wishlist, along with the highly underrated OM5 from OM systems (420 grams) The latter camera is a hybrid marvel when it comes to both photo and video (4K and 120 FPS HD) in a small and lightweight body Try capturing a handheld video with panning using a Sony (eg, the zv1 or the a7c); it's quite challenging The OM5 can do it, and, of course, the G9II can as well Hopefully, Panasonic will continue to innovate and soon release a GX9 mkII and/or a G90 mkII
Comment from : @nndoorgaans

Please compare to Sony A7 series cameras Thanks in advance!
Comment from : @AprilRoxStudios

For someone that isn't into professional photography and treats it more as a hobby and is wanting to upgrade from a G85 would the original G9 suffice over the G9 ii?
Comment from : @Ageratos01

So Can we revisit that "M43 is dead" video you guys made a few years ago?
Comment from : @jay4627

There's also the OM 1 and its lenses It also would be interesting to use Lumix lenses on the OM 1 and vice versabrbrI think those are the real competitors because the lenses are interchangeable T & C apply
Comment from : @oneeyedphotographer

It’s the best choice for wildlife AF says Tony… who has never used an OM-1
Comment from : @paul--b

There is no diffraction equivalence
Comment from : @paul--b

❤ Wonderfull, I want a G9 mark II
Comment from : @Carlosconversa

It does have bird eye AF, you weren't using it properly
Comment from : @IslandFilmMaker

The 100 mp option is mostly a gimmick unless your shoot non-moving landscapes
Comment from : @jamesscharnitz7640

As an owner of the G9 and other m4/3 cameras I am very interested in this interested, but will wait to see AF improvements in firmware first and maybe a minor price drop However, I am very disappointed at the less flexible, non - tilting rear screen of this camera, which is a no-brainer for photographers who want maximum operational flexibility
Comment from : @petercharles6652

I thought this was pre production Performance is still not testable before final firmware
Comment from : @guyjordan8201

Finally a camera I'm exited about again! ❤ (haven't been exited about camera's for years actually)
Comment from : @jellevandermaden

It's a shame that they didn't test the stablization for walking footage g92 has the best stablization against the Z axis shake from walking
Comment from : @steadicamwalker

Odaramo is all i remembered now :D !
Comment from : @RIKAAR_Ambient

I love the little multi-exposure guide at 7:20
Comment from : @alexeijz

I like you guys but three ads from your sponsor in a sub 20-minute video? It gets a bit annoying
Comment from : @TsvetanVR

How did you miss the eye AF on the G9ii?????
Comment from : @ryancampbell1151

Still too big for adventurers IMO, but a lovely camera for front country etc will see what changes with any new firmware upgrades…always needed Tony the M43 good cop today!
Comment from : @gordon3988

Another request for a comparison with the OM-1 I don't have the ability to do careful, specific focus test but it does well focusing with wildlife The ProCapture feature is amazing The And it has numerous cool computational photography features, like live ND Great image stabilization, et, etc It seems a glaring oversight not to include it in the comparison
Comment from : @user-sl7tq7qk1h

Everybody comes back to the king 👑 Lumix!!!!!!
Comment from : @JoseRodriguezarchie8200

I don’t think you mentioned the OM-1 as a main competitor brHow would that camera compare for photography specifically?brbrAlso, which 70-200 equivalent lens did you have on the Canon R7?
Comment from : @joshmartonosi5624

I still like my OM-1 The built-in ND options are more useful than you might think Stabilization is really good I'm also liking starry sky autofocus It's such a different experience from trying to focus on stars manually I do wonder how the G9 ii handles fast readout when capturing 60fps with C-AF It doesn't have a stacked sensor but seems to be rated at pretty high speeds The OM-1 has less MP with a stacked sensor but is still limited to 50fps with C-AF The 25MP sensor isn't Sony, so can't be marketed as BSI, but I wonder if it utilizes a similar technology Regardless, with dual gain what have you, and it might have good dynamic range
Comment from : @jonathanscherer8567