Twenty years later: why the 9/11 twin towers collapsed

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о Twenty years later: why the 9/11 twin towers collapsed

Название	:	Twenty years later: why the 9/11 twin towers collapsed
Продолжительность	:	1.05
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	78 rb

Lol, everything in this video is wrong The inner part was steel columns, not concrete
Comment from : Martin L

Blue pill still going on 🤣🤣
Comment from : Fun Guy

Believe it if you like
Comment from : GEOFF0906

Some says that the basement exploded before it collapse
Comment from : ひとろみとり

And some dorks still belive it was an inside job
Comment from : fireblaster555

Simple
Comment from : DAT

floor after floor they were pushing each other down due to the weight, but if there are other theories other things we don't know I dont know
Comment from : VlsxLoahx

The core wasn't made of reinforced Concrete
Comment from : Paul mccartney

This was by NO means a deficit in design
Comment from : Laurel Wood

What about the other building that fell?
Comment from : Awakken470

Lies
Comment from : USMC E6

What a bunch of malarkey
Comment from : Steven T

At least they found the terrorist' passport down the street with a little dust on it! How fortunate lol
Comment from : chasebatt777

They forgot about the explosives and controlled demolition
Comment from : BrockCarter

This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever watched
Comment from : Chan

You can clearly see all the main supports being blown away from top to bottom as they come down 80-90 of the buildings were still intact If they collapsed the tops would have gone off to the side and the rest of the buildings would still be standing If it collapsed into itself the structure would have slowed the collapse to a stop well before it all turned to dust Lot's of timed explosions from top down, a good way to hide the controlled demolition but still easy to see
Comment from : Gus11445

The sheer weight of the buildings would make them collapse like that almost vertically if you think about
Comment from : Paul f

The core wasn't protected by reinforced concrete The core was incased in sheet rock The floors were concrete but not the core You need to get these basic facts correct
Comment from : CRS

The portions at the top buckling and toppling over okbut both buildings collapsing one right after the other in the EXACT same way is bizarre Controlled demolitions are very precise in order to make sure the building doesn topple over The planes created massive holes on one side of the buidlings at different points on both Even the architect said it could with stand a plane impact It had to be designed that way because they were so tall in an area with heavy air traffic It makes no sense how they just collapsed like that Top parts of tower one buckling and falling over two one sideokbut straight down with no resistance whatsoever EXACTLY like a controlled demolition was and continues to be very suspicious
Comment from : J M

Controlled demolition No doubt about it
Comment from : Blake James

so according to this video 500,000 tons each tower "disintegrated quickly"
Comment from : Eric Klosinski

分かりやすい！
Comment from : ねぬ

lots of people coping here for trying to force the narrative to themselves and on others which is weird They are either bots or uneducated persons who lack the tendency to be skeptical brbrbrbrbrAnyone with a successful elementary school history would and should be suspicious of the collapses of the 2 towers and and building 7
Comment from : sgt wolf

The towers didn't collapse It turned to dust before it hit the grounf
Comment from : B Louise

Yeah okay
Comment from : discobiscuits2100

I always thought that the steel being used in the WTC never could have gotten hot enough by the fires even with the airplanes fuel on it It might not have broken the steel, but weakening it is possible
Comment from : Snowwie

😂 What a load of horsecrap
Comment from : hornox4life

lies
Comment from : Paul-Henry Philemon

shut up
Comment from : J T

The central column was not concrete! it was steel get it straight Such crap
Comment from : J T

Sure! That makes sense! 👀
Comment from : Javi Ruiz

Inside job
Comment from : Shawn Taylor

The evil of Islam that SHOULD NEVER BE FORGIVEN!
Comment from : SimonSpider

This animation shows how ridiculous the oficial theory is!
Comment from : Meton Joffily

this aint why it colapsed, a god damn plane flew into it God bless the people we lost that day
Comment from : SmushYT

What a load of rubbish There were another 90 floors totally untouched by fire Why did they turn to dust and small pieces in 21 seconds?
Comment from : Patrick Smith

lmao i ain gonna trust this propaganda shit
Comment from : DoritoDarling

Airplane hits building Building 2 collapsesbrAirplane hits building Building 1 collapsesbrAirplane crashes 200 miles to the west Building 7 collapsesbrSimple physics
Comment from : TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE

Is this a joke
Comment from : paul Smith

Controlled demolition 🤷
Comment from : John Smith

And how long did it take for the whole building to collapse?
Comment from : Bee Na

Bullshit
Comment from : Novi

Controlled demolition
Comment from : HAKZ

Even today it is bEASY/b to do what no official investigation has attempted to do so far and that is bPROVE/b if it was, or was not a controlled demolition that caused the bTOTAL/b collapse and destruction of the WTC 1 and 2 buildings Calculate the kintec energy of the falling building parts that actually caused any destruction and compare to the energy needed to cause the destruction of the WTC 1 and 2 buildings This could be done by any competent engineering company
Comment from : Dune Xapa

Nice explanation but I feel it was an inside job !
Comment from : Ari

And building 7 fell because of magic
Comment from : AnEagleInYourMind

Absolute utter bullshit!
Comment from : Jon Martin

Nonsense lol
Comment from : im amazin

I'm still confused
Comment from : Dawnzyxio 14

You should be ashamed of yourself for trying to pass this foolishness as science
Comment from : Fred B

I dont why, different videos showing different structures 🙄
Comment from : xyz zyx

This video proves it…brbrbrbrbrbrbrInside job ✈️
Comment from : Dick Slick

it makes no fucking sense
Comment from : Adrian Catalin

What an ABSOLUTE LIE
Comment from : LANE BRADY

So basically if the attacks were to happen in 2021 instead of 2001 The towers would have a good chance on not collapsing due to new technology right?
Comment from : athletic_joseph123

What about the third building?
Comment from : Garrett Yamashiro

-🤓🤓🤡
Comment from : ecc

This is not what NIST says caused the failure The towers didn't fail because the floors collapsed, it failed because the floors DIDN'T collapse They remained attached as they sagged in the heat, pulling in the external columns until the connections between the external columns snapped and the building failed
Comment from : cjnewson88

🧢
Comment from : Zyzzus Christ

0:45
Comment from : INTP

I believe the invisible giant cartoon hammer hammered the tiny little tent peg in the middle clean into the ground became it sounds more plausible than what I've just watched
Comment from : Nick Harvey

how about WTC7 ? without plane attack, but all collapse😢
Comment from : BHT X Wmb

no collapse it just turned to dust
Comment from : Spider Ron

Jenga
Comment from : Nicolas Acosta

Omg American government set this up omg wake up!
Comment from : Kkdreads

I still don't understand why did the building collapse It doesn't make sense for the floors below to have been affected by the top
Comment from : Man1

b100 SPECULATION/b No official investigation has yet bPROVED/b if it was or was not controlled demolition The probability it was not controlled demolition is one divided by infinity
Comment from : Dune Xapa

What happen to the core lol
Comment from : bob dylan

Not true! and explaining why is not true would be such a waste of time at this point
Comment from : Mario Sernak

These events always change the way things are done in the future
Comment from : R K

Omg the comments here: the plane was 150’ wide the side of the tower was 200’ wide, the plane literally had gas that wet everything setting it on fire, the middle held everything together… this was the equivalent of someone using a recoilless anti-tank launcher weapon aimed point blank of a persons guts, the end
Comment from : Jacob Smith

Controlled demolition Tower 7
Comment from : peter Russell

Hhhh Bigs Joke for Imperialis Sick 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
Comment from : KoKa Official

gravity, duh!
Comment from : Doc Lex

It is a idea of probable cause not definite proof!!!!brThe institute says it right up front!!!!brSo quit trying to tell everybody this was proven because it was NOT!!!brI am a retired mechanical engineer and this theory is BULLSHIT!!!!
Comment from : jerome reid

0:32 – 0:37brbr“National Institute of Standards and Technology released its report on why the buildings collapsed”brbrThe focus of the Investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the "probable collapse sequence" although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable brbrp 82 (NCSTAR 1, footnote 13)
Comment from : Reece Howell

0:45 – 0:48brbr“With time the buckling caused the outer walls to deform” (Accompanied by visual of outward bowing external columns) brbrThe primary role of the floors in the collapse of the towers was to provide inward pull forces that induced inward bowing of perimeter columns (south face of WTC1; east face of WTC 2) Sagging floors continued to support floor loads as they pulled inward on the perimeter columns There would have been no inward pull forces if the floors connections had failed and disconnected brp 185, 835 Structural Response and Collapse Analysis, NIST NCSTAR1, WTC Investigation
Comment from : Reece Howell

0:05 – 0:07brbr“Essential core of reinforced concrete” brbrThe 47 columns in this rectangular space were fabricated using primarily 36 ksi and 42 ksi steels and also decreased in size at the higher stories The four massive corner columns bore nearly one-fifth of the total gravity load on the core columns The core columns were interconnected by a grid of conventional steel beams to support the core floors brp 8, 122 The Structures, NIST NCSTAR1, WTC Investigation
Comment from : Reece Howell