Battlefield V Ray Tracing Performance Revisited, Has Nvidia Fixed RTX?

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о Battlefield V Ray Tracing Performance Revisited, Has Nvidia Fixed RTX?

Название	:	Battlefield V Ray Tracing Performance Revisited, Has Nvidia Fixed RTX?
Продолжительность	:	17.58
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	61 rb

We've uploaded a source quality file at 4K 100 Mbps to our Patreon page if you want to see this video in all its glory: wwwpatreoncom/posts/23159530
Comment from : Hardware Unboxed

Sadly the world these days demands Quantity(Performance) over Quality(Resolution, Textures, Fidelity, etc) Major reason behind low sales with RTX cards
Comment from : Infernus Titan

nvidia now wont supply samples to this channel and techspot because they tell the truth about their shit overpriced cards
Comment from : jaggafeen

I can see many problems with the ray traces image It's more confusing
Comment from : D D

Have they fixed the dying cards problem? It's been over a month since I've seen anyone on YouTube talk about it
Comment from : Greg Campbell

I went to try bfv with my new 2070 rtx, so i had to update video driver, and some odd windows update what happened next was alot of other games were crashing and was all badhad to remove windows update and rollback to an older nvidia driver
Comment from : judoz420

Who'd want to blow $1300 on a GPU to play 1440p60
Comment from : Icecream Cohen

Bottom Line 2070 Best Custom Designs still overpriced
Comment from : Aloa He

Ok, let me get this straight The selling point of RTX is higher graphical fidelity After the patch, the raytracing has the same artifacts as SSR, looks blotchy, and is only required when reflecting off of curved surfaces (if the surface is flat, you only need colour correction and another render pass, which should be about 5-10 perf, (doom 3 had this in the bathroom mirrors)), of which there aren't that many brbrHow is this not a gimmick This is the Apple Touchbar, except the touchbar is actually useful
Comment from : Aleksandr Petrosyan

4x SLI 2080ti for 4K 60fps Ultra DXR and also serves as a heater in winter
Comment from : DanteKOG

Is it a secret the patch brought hybrid ssr and DXR ? Digital foundry already explained it
Comment from : 635574

4:13 they have mixed screen space reflections with ray tracingbecause it’s very demanding to ray trace alpha textures such grass etc
Comment from : Acid Rain

I'm totally fine with reduced reflections Sometimes games feel so unreal with much reflections and shininess like everything is oiled up and wet
Comment from : St Andreas

Not being funny but this is new tech not sure why people moaning about the price, maybe its just the US but here in the UK the 1080ti is more expensive than the 2080 and with better optimizations the 2080 will be better than the 1080ti you might say it has higher FPS but of course it does when the 2080 is running DXR if you ran DXR on the 1080ti how much fps would you get
Comment from : GrizzlyHD277

Many people are reporting big increases in standard DX12 mode, in the region of 20-40fps in some areas, with DX12 now outperforming DX11 mode easily, so it seems most of these gains come from general improvements to DX12 and ray tracing in general
Comment from : Chade Fallstar

it's really good but the price is just mental It should've been like the 1080 ti (800 euro's) :(
Comment from : Sian

A game like The Witcher 3 would benefit a lot from Ray Tracing It is an awesome technology that needs to keep being developed
Comment from : Lathan Starnes

Can you test it on a RTX 2070? Thanks!
Comment from : ne0tic

this actually gave hope to ray tracing at least in my heartbrps 720p low is most competitive settings very high framerate
Comment from : Raandom Player

scammed, real RTX cards out in 2 years
Comment from : Aindriú Mac Giolla Eoin

Leaves there is not even half of it on screen now And as of if anyone would notice it Yea not in the heat of fight but than again in such situation You don't look for reflections either This patch surly helps RT to shine as it cannibalize other visualsSo We are getting console experience on PC now when games get a patch for poor performance that actually don't fix anything but lower graphics settings to get better performance Well GJ Nvidia - You can say now that games with RT works smooth
Comment from : AllTechForFun

If you have an RTX 2080 just knock a few setting from Ultra to High and you can play at 1440p 60fps Ultra/High DXR Doubt you will notice much difference between Ultra and High for most of those settings
Comment from : Mister Wolf

At $800 the RTX 2080ti would be fair otherwise they can kiss my ass
Comment from : Is Fire

fyi they removed most of the samples
Comment from : Dave Privacy

just disable the ray shitting!
Comment from : hyou zan ren

I've heard this complaint about the gun reflections before - is this not just what scuffed up, dirty metal reflects like?! It just looks natural to mebrbrI also don't understand why people think better graphics won't impact performance I suppose it's been the same old shit for last 5 years or so, with the tech just pushing around more of the same pixels each year Proper lighting is clearly the future, and obviously the performance hits will decrease as developers learn how best to implement it
Comment from : mcl48YT

Regarding the leaves We noticed it immediately, and wanted to comment on on the spot but decided to wait a bit to see if you are going to point it out or ignore it It is extremely visible especially in side by side comparisons, with pre-patch scenes having way more leaves floating in and around the "shiny" surfaces So you saying that we woudn't have noticed it if you didn't point it out seems disingenuous WE NOTICED!
Comment from : Nandi Brutler

Why do PC games place such an importance on 60fps? I am more than happy with 40fps, it's perfectly playable, especially in single player mode
Comment from : ThatPixelGuy

Nope Saved you 18 minutes
Comment from : mightymegatron

Fuck Nvidia CrapTracing
Comment from : Your Highness

so is it worth turning your CoD clone into a toy story simulator for 2000$?
Comment from : Rusty Blader

Awesome, video not featuring 🤜👱‍♂️
Comment from : Derek Fagan

I really want ray tracing to succeed it looks amazing
Comment from : Jamal Joestar

Was it broken?
Comment from : Most-Lethal

Low is still the sweet spot
Comment from : Just Vienna

They still haven't fixed the bug that doubles the price to performance multiplier
Comment from : Daniel Ferguson

They removed details how the hell is that a "fix" or "optimization" ? They essentially degraded the quality
Comment from : CesarinPillin Gaming

Hardware Unboxed channel is now flooded with AMD's retarded fanboys
Comment from : LV Triverr

IDK man, you can go on forever about wanting the max possible FPS in competitive shooters, in which case you just set everything to the lowest setting At that point, your card's not going to make a big difference if it's a choice between 150fps and 300fps
Comment from : sinephase

Its a shame to see ray-tracing turn out to be more of a marketing move than a worthwhile feature at the moment It might be a neat effect but the computational cost is still so ridiculously high that it isn't worth it Also the cost of these cards have been pushed significantly by the inclusion of this feature which is hard to justify from a consumer value standpoint
Comment from : Alexis Rivera

I just don't understand why is raytracing getting so much attention In its current form, few people could tell if it's on or off
Comment from : Aoyagi

So yes its got better no need for so many words ))
Comment from : BorisTheBlade

will you notice ray tracing when your busy in a 64 player server?
Comment from : BorisTheBlade

78ºC in 1080p? Y otros criticaban a la VEGA 64 que en 4K no levanta más de 62ºC
Comment from : Martín Augusto Palacio

Battlefield V Revisited, has DICE made the game not shit? bSpoiler: Nope, not at all/b
Comment from : The Major League Ginger

It's still unplayable and unstable
Comment from : MOS

"When you die and your whole life flashes before your eyes, how much of it do you want to NOT have ray tracing?" what other arguments do you need?
Comment from : tenow

I'd rather play in 4k with RTX disabled
Comment from : Piterixos

It looks and acts like a first generation card Maybe it'll get better with the 21/30xx cardsbrbrNot holding my breath as I'm sure it wont be till 2020 but ya know
Comment from : James McTavish

I dont wana sell my Kidney For this Shit MY GTX 1060 6gb is enough for me to play game i dont nees that type of graphics im happy 😂🤣😂
Comment from : Mohd Kashif

These are impressive improvements, tbh, but the bars are not well presented - it is confusing to try to search by name and compare The bars for each tier should have been colored differently
Comment from : Михаил Найденов

Nice I may buy an RTX 3080 if they keep working on it
Comment from : daverhodus

Comments on this Video are the worst Can't you see the upcoming benefits of RTX for quality and realism of games in the future?
Comment from : Junkz_o

What a trainwreck
Comment from : Baron von Limbourgh

still no software though, bf5? who cares
Comment from : mysteriousfox88

It's still early They just need more Turing cores Simple as that
Comment from : John Draisey

Why do all gamer youtubers have the same damn chairs?
Comment from : Jace Cavacini

Premium price - Chinese cheap market content brRTX in a nutshell
Comment from : AirAddicted

Meh i stick with my lovely gtx 1070 and playing games 1440p! Feck ray tracing! No way in hell im going back to 1080p and pay twice as my 1070 have cost
Comment from : Xhizor NL

The question is: do BF players care about RT? I am more interested in higher frame rates when in multiplayer than visuals any day! My point of view: Nvidia and Dice nice show of technology however not the primary concern of the game
Comment from : Gasho Simon

50 degrade with 50 performance loool ray tracing Play 4k no DXR with more than 100fps is better :₩
Comment from : Targetlockon

Imagine if Nvidia has waiting until they had this title ready in this current state Or even waiting for the BF5 patch until it was in this statebrThey might of gotten luke warm reviews instead of terrible reviews
Comment from : uglyduckling81

oh my god this ray tracing is such a ripoff It needs 10 years and it needs to come from AMD or not come at all I'll never pay $1300 for a gaming GPU, lol GPU's are throw-away products They aren't like a CPU or monitor which last much longer
Comment from : Moonbogg

Pull a golden pot out of your ass and your might find a 1080 Ti unused
Comment from : sik3xploit

Those leaves look ugly
Comment from : LaxmanM Shettigar

RTX, no thanks
Comment from : Sir Real

so DXR is useless still but at the very least nvidia didn’t lie this time
Comment from : أحمد حميدان

so the dumpsterfire is still burning hot
Comment from : TropiKo

Could you please next time put Pre and Post next to each other instead of ordering them per fps rates?
Comment from : Simjedi

📂 NVIDIA br └📁RTX 2018 br └📁Gaming Value br └⚠️ This folder is empty
Comment from : Potatoz4u

tldw: They increased performances by gutting the quality
Comment from : K M

I want to stop and look at the pretty mirror and die from not paying attention, Don't even want to see that stuff in such a fast paced game anyway
Comment from : By-tor

Ray Tracing is definitely the future and it is amazing they can actually do it in real time at all That said, they really should have released GTX versions of the 2000 series at more reasonable prices, and only had RTX versions of the 2080 and 2080 Ti for the high-end enthusiasts who want to be early adopters
Comment from : RavTokomi

Short Answer: Buy AMD NAVI
Comment from : Sasquatch Guy

Imagine paying $600 to $3000 for a setting that is only used in one game-soon to be about 20, an anti aliasing method that is basically fake resolution and a sharpening filter that only works in supported games, and the new setting on low can bring you down to sub 60 FPS
Comment from : youtuberobbedme ofmyname

People don't understand that when you add new effects such as RT of course performance in fps goes down Common sense is that this is expected It's a poor comparison when measuring fps counter on or off That's like saying setting down the resolution to 640x480 puts the fps many times more faster than 4k or 1440p But are people going to set it that low to squeeze more fps sacrificing visuals? No, get real people Expectations are way too unrealistic for some of you folks
Comment from : Lightsydephil

If you want rays, go outside and enjoy the sun - do not cost too much either :)
Comment from : Fusslowski

Sooo RTX is crap shit by cutting off the amount of details but it was "a foliage" BRAVO
Comment from : Bagdadsky_Hornik

Lol, I've literally NEVER looked at screen space reflections in recent games and thought "man, that looks terrible, we need to fix this" BF5 looks fine, BO4 looks fine, wolfenstein 2 looks fine, forza horizon 4 looks fine RTX is just unnecessary There are so many other things that could be worked on but nvidia be like "lets make reflections and lights look a little better!"so stupid
Comment from : Trevor Mundee

I think Nvidia is making progress here so people with negativity keep playing the way you want and leave the new stuff to us that love what Nvidia's doing If we left things to AMD we might still be in 2015
Comment from : Philip Rudd