The Search for Siegel Zeros - Numberphile

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о The Search for Siegel Zeros - Numberphile

Название	:	The Search for Siegel Zeros - Numberphile
Продолжительность	:	16.27
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	215 rb

heath brown theorem as written here is wrong it is at least one of those 2 statements is true (not either of 2)
Comment from : Vishal Tripathy

Steven Siegel is an amazing world class action zero
Comment from : The Ultimate Reductionist

How come those simply hypothesis get some rather large and unexpect upper bounds? brbrOr is that just a proof that all numbers are equal and we are bias towards smaller number?
Comment from : MrVipitis

I am myself mathematician but doing topics far from these mathematics, and I feel really impressed by the incredible pedagogical skill of this mathematician ! Thank you Tony !
Comment from : Camell Kachour

I may have missed something, but why is the existence of Siegel Zeros so hard to be proved or disproved? As I understood, those roots are real ones (no imaginary part), what makes them (in theory) somewhat easy to be located numerically (should they exist) Is the zeta function wildly oscillatory in the neighbourhood of 1 (approaching by the left)? Maybe I'm too crude on this topic
Comment from : Fausto A A Barbuto

i really love math, but we have to acknowledge that math is still only a defining language, and that you can do with it pretty like you want to
Comment from : jd4200mhz

Can someone explain how the negative even number values for the real part of s yield zeros and why this is trivial?
Comment from : 000998poi

I didn't understand half of that but I'm happy for the progress on Riemann hypothesis :)
Comment from : Robi_CK

I did n-t quite understand that if it'd disprove the „Generalized Riemann Hypothesis“, it'd disprove the „Riemann Hypothesis“ as well — as I did not understand if the RH is „totally“ included in the GRH or if it is just one case of the GRH and those „Siegel-zeros“ could be found to be in other cases but not in the „special“ case of the RHbrCould some-one help? I'd appreciate it 🌞👍🏻
Comment from : Hamboarding

At 5:18 Tony writes the symbol for chi (correctly) as χ, but the symbol in the 'printed' (non-paper) version is ϗ, which is an abbreviation for the common Greek word "και" ("kai"), meaning 'and'
Comment from : Steven Lytle

At 1:45, Tony says "the zeta function" but writes the letter xi (ξ) instead of zeta (ζ) [Together for better comparison: ξζ ]
Comment from : Steven Lytle

Mathematics proves that nothing matters and Academia is a social welfare program for autistic menbrOh, I forgot Now autistic women Statistics matter
Comment from : YawnGod

No one is ever going to persuade me that 1 plus anything positive is minus anything!
Comment from : Terrance Parsons

Mochizuki may have proved non-existence of Siegel zeros
Comment from : okinawapunter

I thought Seigel Zero's was the nickname of the bullet holes Bugsy Seigel would shoot into his victims
Comment from : Dan LaBrecque

Speaking as an easily-amused person watching mathematicians construct their lowercase zetas differently is hugely entertaining
Comment from : EconAtheist