This is NOT how Open Source works - Common Myths and misconceptions

Video quality	The size	Download

Информация о This is NOT how Open Source works - Common Myths and misconceptions

Название	:	This is NOT how Open Source works - Common Myths and misconceptions
Продолжительность	:	15.22
Дата публикации	:
Просмотров	:	23 rb

Кадры This is NOT how Open Source works - Common Myths and misconceptions

Описание This is NOT how Open Source works - Common Myths and misconceptions

Коментарии This is NOT how Open Source works - Common Myths and misconceptions

The first part is very convicting and challenging to me (no, I'm not saying what you're telling me is bad; it's actually good You're right that the devs deserve to be rewarded for their work) God knows, I'm guilty of not contributing money to OSS I have used; I really should start contributing because I like Blender, Inkscape and LibreOffice to name a fewbrbrAnd the topic of telemetry is really eye-opening It makes sense that a developer should know what hardware is being used for their programs If that's all they need to optimize their OSS or DE, it's not that unreasonable a request
Comment from : Andrew Sarley

TLDR: Always have the benefit of the doubt
Comment from : Yivan

Thank you for this video
Comment from : Horse

I have a friend who needs to see the feature request segment so badly He gets so judgemental over design choices that are different from the ones he would me
Comment from : Alex McD

if a company owns an open source software its less open source and more of a spyware as proven by audacity controversy brsome open source software performs as good as these premium over priced garbage im looking at you adobe theres no way im gonna pay 6049euros a month cause thats a lot of wasted money for an individual bryet again most software were open source till someone got the ownership and there always gaps in security compatibility and optimization except companies has the resources to do it but they either dont want to or dont care
Comment from : Nogardtist

@10:38 Yes, and it is perfectly in the user's right to not use itbr@11:29 You could use a survey, instead Telemetry can be use non-privacy invasive but would you trust someone you don't know? That's why telemetry is a privacy issue
Comment from : Red Phoenix

I like KDE's approach on telemetry because it's clear what they'll collect and their intentions on doing sobrAlso, having the telemetry turned off by default is a good way to say "I respect your data and I'm friendly asking your help" The first time I saw these settings really amazed me
Comment from : Artur José

有道理
Comment from : 林业天

I wasn't aware of KDE's feedback option I turned it on (all the parameters) to help with the development People don't often realize that these statistics are supposed to help improve the software, not to "spy" on them
Comment from : Pawel X

6:14 that's why I never submit code, bugs, bugfixes, etc unless specifically requested by a project maintainer or paid upfront
Comment from : Wolf Bronski

I really like your accent
Comment from : dexterdy Krataigos

Having telemetry off by default is nice if you're gonna have it
Comment from : That one Goblin

"Developers are lazy" is an awful thing to say about developers of FLOSS
Comment from : That one Goblin

Love open source and try only to use it And have read and moded 000000000001 of the code But the option to have it is priceless And would pay more for that
Comment from : Ryan Jardina